Teach English in Songhe Zhen - Jingmen Shi

For almost a hundred years the IQ test, which tested reading and logical skills, was used to determine a person’s general intelligence. Howard Gardener, a Harvard psychologist found this idea too limiting and in 1983 introduced his theory of multiple intelligences, where intelligence is made up of more diverse skills. Gardener initially listed 7 intelligences. Linguistic intelligence, the ability to read, write and communicate with words. Logical-mathematical intelligence, the ability to reason and calculate. Musical intelligence, the ability to create, communicate and understand meanings made out of sound. Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, the ability to use all or part of one’s body to create products, solve problems, or present ideas. Spatial intelligence, the ability to think in pictures and visualize future results. Interpersonal intelligence, the ability to understand and connect with other people. Intrapersonal intelligence, the ability to understand yourself and know who you are and what you can do. Later, an eighth intelligence was added. Naturalist Intelligence, the ability to distinguish among, classify, and use features of the environment. The extent to which the various intelligences develop significantly depends on a person’s education and culture and no two people have exactly the same intelligences in the same combination and no single test can measure how well a person would perform a cognitive task. As people develop skills or solve problems they use multiple intelligences at the same time in a complementary manner. It is clear that children learn differently, or have different ‘learning styles’. The theory of multiple intelligences appeared to validate this idea and led educators to develop new approaches that could better meet the needs of the range of learners in a classroom. However, over time ‘multiple intelligences’ somehow became synonymous with the concept of ‘learning styles’ something that Gardener himself does not agree with. The multiple intelligence theory is not supposed to be used to teach a child using only their strongest intelligences. Paul-Howard Jones, professor of neuroscience and education at the University of Bristol says that the belief that students learn better when they receive information tailored to their preferred learning styles is a myth. Gardener does agree that multiple intelligence theory can be used in the classroom. According to Gardener, students should be given multiple ways to access information, which not only makes the lessons more engaging but students will be more likely to remember information presented in different ways. When individualizing lessons the teacher should think about student’s needs and interests. Incorporating art into lessons allows students to express themselves in different ways. Presenting materials in various ways, conveys what it means to understand something well. When one has a thorough understanding of a topic, one can typically think of it in several ways. If you can only teach in one way, your own understanding is likely to be thin. Gardener warns not to label students with a particular type of intelligence or ‘learning style’ as this can be harmful and discourage students from exploring other ways of thinking and learning, or developing their weaker skills. Do not try to match a lesson to a students perceived learning style. In summary, the theory of multiple intelligences should influence how teachers teach to the point that the method of one-style-fits-all teaching should be avoided and a teacher should consider students needs and interests, when designing a lesson. Presenting the information in a number of different ways that use a range of the students’ multiple intelligences is more likely to be remembered. Do not try to label a students learning style and do not try to modify lessons based on those perceived labels, it is unnecessary and possibly harmful.